Earlestown station platform 3. LCGB Widnes and Warrington brake van tour, 5th August 1967, headed by BR 2-6-0 76077 from St. Helens Sutton Oak 8G shed. Picture by local photographer, the late Eddie Bellass
Despite the never ending onslaught of rain and my workplace of Worcester trying its best to resemble the mighty Amazon river (I have an Ark on back order from the rainforest!), work never stops in the GWSR steam department. This weekend saw a merry band of volunteers working hard to get our serviceable locomotives ready for the start of the new operating season on Saturday 14th February. Judging by the weather forecast, it looks like it may be dry, although saying that, it has pretty much rained every day since the start of the year, thus my optimistic nature is being tested at the moment.
We all love to see an engine hard at work and providing enjoyment to our many visitors throughout the year, but as many will know, the operation of locomotives is just a small part of what is required to run a successful railway. Just getting an engine to the point that it becomes serviceable is a challenge in itself. Maintenance and restoration takes a big chunk of our time. It matters because it's our history and our heritage, and we try our very best to preserve as much of it as we can.
I know that not everyone uses Facebook or social media for that matter, so I thought it might be worth sharing some recent updates about the restoration of our 'Forgotten Standard' No. 76077. Much of the following is taken from the groups Facebook page, and also includes a recent update on the boiler from the official website. I hope that this is of some interest. and any support, however small, is greatly appreciated. As the title of this blog suggests, locomotive restoration is far from plain sailing. You can find out more here: https://standard76077.com/
Boiler update December 2025 – a nightmare before Christmas!
This update is a brief synopsis of a presentation given at the Toddington Standard Locomotive Ltd Annual General Meeting on 29th November 2025. Copies of this report have also been circulated to Shareholders that were not able to attend in person.
Despite our best efforts the overhaul of our boiler is proving to be a challenge, with increasingly more additional work being discovered as the boiler is dismantled. We had already reported the need to replace the lower sections of the sides of the copper firebox due to extensive star cracking around most of the stay holes in the copper. We were also aware that the previous repairs to the laps in the copper Doorplate were a cause for concern. It was agreed with the boiler inspector that the copper Doorplate should be removed to enable us to examine the quality of the previous repairs done at Eastleigh in 1964. There were also a few localised areas around the Firehole door that needed to be built up with copper weld. Leaky Finders decided to carry out the weld repairs around the Firehole door before removing the Doorplate as the surrounding stays and rivets would ensure the copper did not distort during the welding process when the localised heat from the welding can cause the copper to deform if not held firmly in place. Soon after welding was started, Leaky Finders contacted me to say that what looked like blow holes were appearing in the copper plate around the door ring rivet holes. Having never seen this issue before, it was agreed that welding work should be paused and the copper Doorplate removed to see exactly what was going on.
Removal of the copper doorplate confirmed our fears that the platework around the Firehole door joint was riddled with cracks, and the welding had caused them to open up becoming cavities below the surface of the platework. Further examination of the replacement lap sections fitted by Eastleigh showed the penetration, and quality of the weld to be even worse than first feared. Star cracking radiating from many of the stay holes like that discovered in the firebox side sheets was also discovered. With copper welding being a very expensive exercise, due to the helium shielding gas and copper filler rods the costs to try and repair the Doorplate could be as much as 75% of the cost of a replacement, and there may still be unseen issues in other parts of the platework, that could cause us trouble in the future. We were fortunate to discover that the NYMR has a former for flanging this item and as it is almost identical to the 80xxx class locos it could be used. They have kindly agreed to let us use the former in return for a donation to one of their locomotive appeals, the fact that we don’t need to manufacture a former has saved us a considerable amount of money and is a great example of locomotive owning groups working together.
Removal of the copper doorplate confirmed our fears that the platework around the Firehole door joint was riddled with cracks, and the welding had caused them to open up becoming cavities below the surface of the platework. Further examination of the replacement lap sections fitted by Eastleigh showed the penetration, and quality of the weld to be even worse than first feared. Star cracking radiating from many of the stay holes like that discovered in the firebox side sheets was also discovered. With copper welding being a very expensive exercise, due to the helium shielding gas and copper filler rods the costs to try and repair the Doorplate could be as much as 75% of the cost of a replacement, and there may still be unseen issues in other parts of the platework, that could cause us trouble in the future. We were fortunate to discover that the NYMR has a former for flanging this item and as it is almost identical to the 80xxx class locos it could be used. They have kindly agreed to let us use the former in return for a donation to one of their locomotive appeals, the fact that we don’t need to manufacture a former has saved us a considerable amount of money and is a great example of locomotive owning groups working together.
Having taken all the above findings into account, we are planning to renew the copper doorplate as we feel this is the best use of our finances. As there is a 12-week lead time to deliver the copper, we have already placed the order which hopefully should arrive in the UK early in 2026.
You may recall that I previously reported that ultrasonic inspection can not be used as a reliable method to detect flaws in the steel due to the laminations present. The removal of the Doorplate has enabled us to see the waterside of the steel Backhead. To save money our dedicated team of volunteers have been traveling to Devon and needle gunning the inside of the boiler, to remove the build-up of scale. The waterside of the Backhead was needle gunned which enabled a Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI) to be carried out by a Non-destructive testing specialist.
First impressions were that it appeared to be in very good condition, the scale build-up seeming to have protected the steel from excessive corrosion. Even the lower section near the foundation ring which is prone to grooving looked better than expected. Unfortunately, this initial hope soon turned into more bad news when the MPI testing was carried out. What they discovered was a series of cracks running almost top to bottom between the stay holes adjacent to the corners. There was also evidence that other stay holes across the Backhead were beginning to suffer the same problem.
You may recall that I previously reported that ultrasonic inspection can not be used as a reliable method to detect flaws in the steel due to the laminations present. The removal of the Doorplate has enabled us to see the waterside of the steel Backhead. To save money our dedicated team of volunteers have been traveling to Devon and needle gunning the inside of the boiler, to remove the build-up of scale. The waterside of the Backhead was needle gunned which enabled a Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI) to be carried out by a Non-destructive testing specialist.
First impressions were that it appeared to be in very good condition, the scale build-up seeming to have protected the steel from excessive corrosion. Even the lower section near the foundation ring which is prone to grooving looked better than expected. Unfortunately, this initial hope soon turned into more bad news when the MPI testing was carried out. What they discovered was a series of cracks running almost top to bottom between the stay holes adjacent to the corners. There was also evidence that other stay holes across the Backhead were beginning to suffer the same problem.
A crack propagating from a stay hole - Photo courtesy of TSLL
Whilst it would potentially be possible to weld up all these cracks and to install larger stays connecting the Backhead to the new copper Doorplate, the issue of the laminated steel would remain. When the boiler inspector visited us to discuss the issue of lamination, his advice was to devise a long term plan to replace sections of the steel in the boiler during future overhauls to eradicate as much of the laminations as possible. As boiler examination now relies heavily on NDT techniques the presence of laminations in this area of the boiler (known to suffer issues) could cause us complications when carrying out future testing. In addition to the above it seems ridiculous and a waste of money to renew the copper doorplate only to ream out all the stay holes to a large size, reducing the life of the repairs significantly.
The only sensible answer is to renew all or part of the boiler Backhead, which is currently where the problems lie. The best, and our favoured repair, is to replace the complete Backhead below the level of the firebox crown, known as a ¾ repair. Unfortunately, the 76xxx class locomotive has a different Backhead to that fitted to the 80xxx and 75xxx class 4 locomotives. A former for these classes does exist at the South Devon Railway, but whether it can be modified to accommodate the 76xxx class boiler is currently in doubt. To the best of our knowledge, no 76xxx class locos, or the Class predecessors the LMS Ivatt 2-6-0 class 4 locos have had a replacement Backheads in preservation, so we would be the first. As I write this article, we are still awaiting a formal response from South Devon Railway Engineering as to whether they can supply, and if so what the costs would be. We are also talking to Mendip Steam, who flanged our new throatplate and front tubeplate, to enquire whether they could make a former to the exact shape of our existing Backhead and flange a replacement.
The only sensible answer is to renew all or part of the boiler Backhead, which is currently where the problems lie. The best, and our favoured repair, is to replace the complete Backhead below the level of the firebox crown, known as a ¾ repair. Unfortunately, the 76xxx class locomotive has a different Backhead to that fitted to the 80xxx and 75xxx class 4 locomotives. A former for these classes does exist at the South Devon Railway, but whether it can be modified to accommodate the 76xxx class boiler is currently in doubt. To the best of our knowledge, no 76xxx class locos, or the Class predecessors the LMS Ivatt 2-6-0 class 4 locos have had a replacement Backheads in preservation, so we would be the first. As I write this article, we are still awaiting a formal response from South Devon Railway Engineering as to whether they can supply, and if so what the costs would be. We are also talking to Mendip Steam, who flanged our new throatplate and front tubeplate, to enquire whether they could make a former to the exact shape of our existing Backhead and flange a replacement.
What we hope to achieve on our boiler. A new Backhead & copper Doorplate being made and fitted to standard tank 80135 for the NYMR. Photo Credit: Heritage Boiler Steam Services Limited.
There is an alternative repair which could be done and that is to cut out the areas of the Backhead where the stays are fitted and weld in new platework. This would eradicate the cracks and enable first size stays to be fitted, but we would still have laminated steel in the corner radiuses which could cause issues when welding in the new platework. The amount of linear welding would also be considerable, so the costs of welding would be greater. Currently we are considering this repair to be a last resort if the costs of a replacement Backhead prove to be considerably more than expected.
So where does this leave the boiler overhaul now?
We have had a fantastic response to our boiler appeal this year and that has been significantly boosted by the “Match Funding” initiative, so we have a lot to be thankful for. A lot of work has been done on the boiler, the new front barrel section has been fitted, the new tubeplate has been flanged and is being marked out and drilled. A new throatplate piece has been formed ready to replace the lower section under the boiler barrel. The foundation ring has been removed and weld repairs carried out, and a significant amount of careful stripping of parts of the boiler carried out. New C107 copper sheet has been sourced ready to be fitted in the firebox, together with copper material for stays and patch screws stockpiled.
So where does this leave the boiler overhaul now?
We have had a fantastic response to our boiler appeal this year and that has been significantly boosted by the “Match Funding” initiative, so we have a lot to be thankful for. A lot of work has been done on the boiler, the new front barrel section has been fitted, the new tubeplate has been flanged and is being marked out and drilled. A new throatplate piece has been formed ready to replace the lower section under the boiler barrel. The foundation ring has been removed and weld repairs carried out, and a significant amount of careful stripping of parts of the boiler carried out. New C107 copper sheet has been sourced ready to be fitted in the firebox, together with copper material for stays and patch screws stockpiled.
With the necessary additional boiler work now identified, the cost to complete the boiler overhaul will inevitably rise. We are in the process of obtaining revised quotations from Leaky Finders for this additional work, but it is far from a simple process. It is currently being held up by the issue of the replacement Backhead, and whether a cost-effective replacement is possible. I was hoping by now to be able to give you some definitive costs, but we are just not yet in that position. Rather than speculate the TSLL board would prefer to hold back and let you know when we have the revised costings.
This latest news is obviously not what any of us wanted to hear or were expecting. We were led to believe by many well-respected steam locomotive boiler experts that have examined 76077’s boiler over the last 30 years, that it was in relatively good condition, but that was from what could be seen. It’s turned out to be the parts that couldn’t be seen or were supposedly repaired in 1964 that are causing the issues.
As engine owners we have just been very unlucky. Both Rory at Leaky Finders and I have been involved in this profession for many years, and we have never seen such a catalogue of issues on what is a relatively new boiler. Rory commented that the condition of the boiler gives the impression it’s done 100 years in service not 16 years. Despite this set back we will push on and get the job done, although clearly it will take a lot longer than first thought. Because of the additional repairs, it should become one of the best boilers in preservation and keep 76077 and steam alive for many more generations to come.
To demonstrate that the work on 76077’s boiler will be money well spent, recently another of the locomotives based on the GWSR, 7820 Dinmore Manor, had its boiler lifted out of the frames after 11 years of service in preparation of its 3rd overhaul in preservation. Like ours that boiler had an extensive list of repairs carried out during its last overhaul, and the work done then still looks to be in excellent condition. This is a testament to the quality of the GWSR’s water treatment and the dedicated team that look after and monitor the system. The easy gradients on the GWSR and the quality of the training of the locomotive crews have also played an important role in looking after that boiler during the past 11 years, all very encouraging for 76077’s operational future.
Finally, I must say a huge thank you to all our shareholders and supporters who have contributed to our project, it is so greatly appreciated. Special thanks go to our anonymous benefactor for their gesture of support for the project, which has made such a positive difference despite the recent boiler issues. We are definitely not out of the woods yet, and we will have to find ways to raise additional funds. The TSLL board are working on this but would welcome any suggestions from you. I realise that with the rising costs of living many of us are now facing even more financial pressures at home, but if you are able, please continue to add to your shareholding in 2026.
This latest news is obviously not what any of us wanted to hear or were expecting. We were led to believe by many well-respected steam locomotive boiler experts that have examined 76077’s boiler over the last 30 years, that it was in relatively good condition, but that was from what could be seen. It’s turned out to be the parts that couldn’t be seen or were supposedly repaired in 1964 that are causing the issues.
As engine owners we have just been very unlucky. Both Rory at Leaky Finders and I have been involved in this profession for many years, and we have never seen such a catalogue of issues on what is a relatively new boiler. Rory commented that the condition of the boiler gives the impression it’s done 100 years in service not 16 years. Despite this set back we will push on and get the job done, although clearly it will take a lot longer than first thought. Because of the additional repairs, it should become one of the best boilers in preservation and keep 76077 and steam alive for many more generations to come.
To demonstrate that the work on 76077’s boiler will be money well spent, recently another of the locomotives based on the GWSR, 7820 Dinmore Manor, had its boiler lifted out of the frames after 11 years of service in preparation of its 3rd overhaul in preservation. Like ours that boiler had an extensive list of repairs carried out during its last overhaul, and the work done then still looks to be in excellent condition. This is a testament to the quality of the GWSR’s water treatment and the dedicated team that look after and monitor the system. The easy gradients on the GWSR and the quality of the training of the locomotive crews have also played an important role in looking after that boiler during the past 11 years, all very encouraging for 76077’s operational future.
Finally, I must say a huge thank you to all our shareholders and supporters who have contributed to our project, it is so greatly appreciated. Special thanks go to our anonymous benefactor for their gesture of support for the project, which has made such a positive difference despite the recent boiler issues. We are definitely not out of the woods yet, and we will have to find ways to raise additional funds. The TSLL board are working on this but would welcome any suggestions from you. I realise that with the rising costs of living many of us are now facing even more financial pressures at home, but if you are able, please continue to add to your shareholding in 2026.
Andrew Meredith
TSLL Engineering Director
TSLL Engineering Director
<---------------------->
Now, on to further developments. In recent months, great progress has been made on some other components.
13th December 2025
Very good day with 6 of us at Toddington progressing bits for 77. As usual, explanations with the photos.
The front sandbox has been fabricated by Rob off-site and awaited us when we arrived. Fantastic work. Neil then spent a couple of hours dressing the welds, and it’s now ready for shot blasting and then painting.
The 6 rusty items are the firebox grate support brackets. They all needed work, whilst 2 new ones (both front left and right) needed welding.
The two new brackets in work.
All of the other four brackets have had the new locating lugs welded on. These locate the grate carriers supports.
The final new metal has been let into the ash-pan hopper bracket. This was then cleaned up and given a coat of primer.
A pair of steam pipe shrouds. These need old broken and seized studs removing.
One of them will have to go away for specialist repair, as you can see it’s missing a decent chunk.
13th February 2026 - Photo courtesy of TSLL
Keith worked on the 6 brake hanger crossbeam cotters.
They started to come together by the afternoon.
The rings for the tender ladder were cut to length. Next time we will look to assemble the ladder.
Lubrication pipe clamps cleaned up, they just need 2 holes drilling in each.
With the imminent return of the tender wheel sets, having had the new bearings pushed on, we are starting to think about reassembling the axles boxes. The cork gaskets that sit behind the yellow axle covers were cut.
13th February 2026 - Photo courtesy of TSLL
Finally, the items sent for wire eroding of the square holes were returned by Keith. This included a number of cab handles and extension rod connectors. They look superb.
5th February 2026
After much cutting, fettling and no doubt, cussing, the first of the cylinder valve cladding is finally bolted on by our volunteer crew. Great work chaps - just another three to do!
7th February 2026
7 of us working on bits at Toddington today. A few jobs progressed, and a few new ones started. We’re working our way through some of the boiler fittings, some of which were made over 25 years ago now, and need a check to ensure they are what they say they are and give them a little TLC after years in storage. At the same time, we’re checking many of the mounting brackets for fit and making new ones where required. See photos for details!
Andrew turned up with the newly completed regulator rod, along with its mounting bracket, which was needed to ensure a good fit. The rod has been sponsored by a member of the loco dept at Toddington, so many thanks to him. If anyone has an AWS sunflower they’d like to donate, we’d happily accept!
The rod receives a coat of red oxide. The consensus is to paint it black, which was how they were.
7th February 2026 - Photo courtesy of TSLL
Keith made a good job of the square on the end of the manifold shut off rod.
7th February 2026 - Photo courtesy of TSLL
Final fettling and hole drilling of more pipe clamps by Alastair.
A visit to our off site storage site saw us bringing back the main boiler manifold, two injector steam valves, the main vacuum ejector and one auxiliary shut off valve from the manifold. These have all gone away for cleaning and checking, and in some instances, new mounting brackets need to be made.
7th February 2026 - Photo courtesy of TSLL
The two injector steam valves were tried on the original mounting plate; now to source 6 of 5 1/4” bolts.
7th February 2026 - Photo courtesy of TSLL
Keith completed the new cotters bar the split.
Matthew started on the new mounting bracket for the ejector steam valve. The wastage on the original can be seen, as well as where non-ferrous fittings were gas-axed off at the scrapyard.
76077 at Sutton Oak - 13th June 1965 - Photograph Fred Patrick
76077 looking in a very sad state in Spring 1987 - Photo courtesy of S. A. Williams https://flic.kr/p/7EfEhu
<---------------------->
For those of you who use Facebook, here are a number of GWSR related groups which are worth following:
DMLL - Dinmore Manor Locomotive Ltd
2874 - The 2874 Trust
35006 - 35006 Group
76077 - Standard Locomotive 76077
THL - The Honeybourne Line - a GWR mainline in the makingA very important weekend in May for your diaries, with further news and announcements due soon. *
Anyway, that's all I have for now folks. It's going to get a little louder at Toddington later this week!
Alex (the sooty one!).
Alex (the sooty one!).
* Please Note: All locomotives are subject to availability and changes may be made at short notice.
All published photographs and videos are my own unless otherwise stated/credited.







































No comments:
Post a Comment